This is not an apologetic for Pope Francis’s Gaudete et Exsultate. For the time being, having just skimmed through the document, I refuse to write an apologetic for Francis’s new apostolic exhortation. Especially in light of the following concerns.

Don’t get me wrong. I love Pope Francis. I also respect Dave Armstrong as a Catholic apologist, and I appreciate him using his gifts as a Catholic writer to defend Pope Francis from His Holiness’s many critics. Most recently these critics include Ignatius Insight and Catholic World Report editor Carl Olson. To be fair, I have also benefitted from Olson’s previous work as a a Catholic apologist and editor. During the early days of the Catholic blogosphere–then known collectively as St Blog’s–Olson and I blogged together at Pat Madrid’s Envoy Insight.

In the latest controversy between online Catholic apologists, Olson published a blog critical of the Holy Father’s new apostolic exhortation: “Pope Francis ‘takes aim’ in ‘Gaudete et Exsultate’–and misses?” To which Dave Armstrong responded with the following pro-Francis apologetic: “Olson’s Nitpicking, Persnickety Guide to Gaudete et Exsultate”. Being familiar with both parties, I am tempted to ignore my retirement from Catholic apologetics and weigh in on their controversy.

Yet my own quick reading of the apostolic exhortation tells me that such an apologetic is premature. At 177 paragraphs, the apostolic exhortation is rather long. (Especially given Jesuit penchant for brevity.) It is clear Pope Francis has put more than a day’s thought into this document. As successor to St Peter, to whom Christ entrusted the keys of the Church, are Pope Francis’s magisterial teachings not worth more than a day to read, ponder, and meditate upon prior to critiquing?

Olson’s critique is date April 9, 2018. This is the same day Gaudete et Exsultate was released to the public. Now in fairness to Olsen he has stated in Armstrong’s combox that he received an embargoed (advance) copy which he read through twice. Yet I still question Olson’s attempt to appear objective and impartial in his original blog entry. For accentuating the text of his critique is an unflattering and angry-looking photo of Pope Francis.

As of this writing (April 10, 2018), not even the reactionary tridentinist Remnant has published a critique (though presumably one is forthcoming). Yet Catholic World Report, at one time staple reading for orthodox Catholics within the English-speaking world, has already proclaimed Gaudate et Exsulatate‘s good parts overshadowed by “straw men, dubious arguments, and cheap shots.” Certainly Catholics faithful to the Holy Father may wonder at the irony of this subheading juxtaposed above Catholic World Report‘s interesting choice of papal photo. A picture’s worth of a thousand words might be in exposing the heart of its publisher.

Not surprisingly, Olson’s concluding paragraph summarizes the overall negative tone he and other American-based neo-conservative Catholic writers have adopted towards Francis’s papacy:

[While] I certainly have benefited in some ways from reading Gaudete et Exsultate, the good qualities and substantive passages in documents and texts such as this are increasingly overshadowed, or even undermined, by the grave tensions and growing conflicts within the Church. Especially since, sadly, Pope Francis and his closest collaborators have not only failed to address those tensions and conflicts, they have played a significant role in exacerbating and deepening them. They do appear to be take pleasure in “taking aim” at Catholics they deem to be too dogmatic, rigid, and focused on liturgy.  It is a shame that this has continued in this apostolic exhortation on holiness but it is not, I’m sorry to say, too much of a surprise.

How does a Catholic faithful to the Church respond to such a consistently negative view of Francis’s papal writings? Especially when published the same day the Holy Father released his apostolic exhortation? And by an author who formerly was among the papacy’s most reliable defenders?

Here is my suggestion for Catholics who remain faithful to the Church and to the Bishop of Rome as its visible head: Read the document slowly. After a quick overall reading go back and read each paragraph s-l-o-w-l-y.

Pause after each paragraph to contemplate its message, asking yourselves the following three questions:

  1. How does this paragraph contribute to the overall message of Pope Francis’s Gaudete et Exsultate?
  2. What is Christ teaching the universal Church through this particular paragraph of the apostolic exhortation?
  3. How can I answer the Holy Spirit’s call to live this teaching with my local community? Whether it be home, parish, or work?

The best apologetic response for Pope Francis’s new apostolic exhortation is one carefully read, mediated upon, and then practiced. Especially when implemented into one’s daily living as a Catholic. Ignore critics attempting to poison others from reading it. As noted by Pope Francis (par 19), “Each saint is a mission, planned by the Father to reflect and embody, at a specific moment in history, a certain aspect of the Gospel.”

 


Discuss this article!

Keep the conversation going in our SmartCatholics Group! You can also find us on Facebook and Twitter.


Liked this post? Take a second to support Where Peter Is on Patreon!

Pete Vere is a canonist, author, and catechist. His books include Surprised by Canon Law (volumes 1 & 2), More Catholic Than The Pope, and Annulments: 100 Questions and Answers. Pete and wife Sonya are blessed with seven children. In his spare time Pete enjoys camping with his family, riding his Indian Scout motorcycle, and refereeing professional wrestling.

Share via
Copy link